Short Description
A New Hampshire legislator’s resolution seeks to redefine the border for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, aiming to alleviate tax burdens for over 3,100 New Hampshire workers currently taxed by Maine.
Read Time
3 minutes 45 seconds
Main Article
A recent legislative move in New Hampshire has reignited an ongoing border dispute with Maine concerning the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. Republican Rep. Joseph Barton, a freshman lawmaker, spearheads a resolution urging Congress to declare the Piscataqua River and Portsmouth Harbor as part of New Hampshire. This initiative is designed to lessen the financial strain on more than 3,100 New Hampshire residents employed at the shipyard, who are presently subject to Maine’s income taxes. The resolution has sparked discussions about tax implications and jurisdiction, fueling interest among finance enthusiasts and local taxpayers alike.
The crux of the resolution centers around the tax status of shipyard employees. New Hampshire boasts no state income tax, while its residents working at the shipyard currently pay taxes to Maine. By redrawing the state border to include the shipyard, Barton argues, New Hampshire residents could benefit from substantial tax relief, ultimately allowing them to retain more of their earnings. Although Barton noted that the state won’t see an increase in tax revenue, the proposed border change would have a notable impact on personal finances for those who reside in the Granite State.
However, the resolution isn’t without complications. As Kittery Town Manager Kendra Amaral pointed out, if New Hampshire were to assume control of the shipyard, it would face significant infrastructure and traffic challenges. Currently, both access points to the naval station cross through Kittery, Maine, and New Hampshire would need to invest in the necessary infrastructure to address potential congestion. This could further complicate New Hampshire’s push for jurisdiction over the shipyard, especially in light of past rulings, including a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2001 that reaffirmed the middle of the Piscataqua River as the boundary between the states.
The Portsmouth Naval Shipyard is vital not only for local employment but also for the broader economy, boasting a payroll of $716.2 million and generating over $1.5 billion in economic impact for the region in 2023 alone. Barton’s resolution claims that jurisdiction over the tidal waters and submerged lands of the river has always belonged to New Hampshire, emphasizing the state’s perspective in the ongoing border discussions.
With a public hearing completed, the resolution will soon require House and Senate approval, followed by the governor’s signature. As discussions progress, stakeholders from both sides of the border, including taxpayers and local officials, will need to weigh the economic implications, infrastructure challenges, and jurisdictional authority inherent in this contentious issue.
Short Summary
New Hampshire’s recent proposal aims to redefine the border of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, potentially relieving tax burdens for over 3,100 residents. With substantial economic implications and infrastructure challenges ahead, both states will need to navigate the complexities of this ongoing border dispute, making it a critical topic for taxpayers and finance enthusiasts.
