Short Description:
India advocates for climate justice at the ICJ, emphasizing equity in global mitigation efforts and criticizing the inadequacy of developed nations’ climate finance commitments.
Read Time: 3 Minutes and 45 Seconds
Main Article:
India recently made a compelling case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), asserting that equitable global action is essential in the fight against climate change. Highlighting the disparity in historical emissions, India argued that it is unjust to expect countries with minimal historical contributions to share an equal burden in climate mitigation efforts. Joint Secretary in the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Luther M Rangreji, underscored the need for developed nations to enhance their climate finance, which has proven insufficient for the adaptation and mitigation needs of developing countries.
Developed countries have faced criticism for their historical exploitation of resources, which has significantly contributed to the climate crisis. Rangreji stressed that with resources unequally consumed, the accountability must also reflect this reality. "If the contribution to degradation is unequal, the responsibility must also be unequal," he declared during the hearing. This assertion is central in discussions about climate equity and the need for responsibility-sharing among nations.
Moreover, Rangreji pointed to the disproportionate effects of climate change on developing nations, pointing out their lower contributions to the problem. He emphasized that while developed nations have access to advanced technology and substantial financial resources, they often demand that developing countries refrain from utilizing their national energy resources, further deepening the inequity. India’s stance echoes the sentiments of many nations that have called for a more just and equitable approach to climate action, particularly in light of the unfulfilled climate finance pledges that date back to 2009.
The dire need for enhanced commitments was made clear when Rangreji criticized the $100 billion climate finance promise, along with additional adaptation funds that have remained largely unfulfilled. He dismissed the newly agreed climate finance package from COP29 as inadequate for meeting the diverse needs of developing nations that are struggling with the impacts of climate change while balancing their sustainable development goals. Notably, over 98 countries are participating in the ICJ hearings, indicating a growing consensus on the need for climate justice.
India’s firm yet balanced approach at the ICJ reiterates its commitment to the Paris Agreement while addressing the socioeconomic realities of its large population facing the brunt of climate impacts. Although the court’s advisory opinion may not be legally binding, its implications could influence future climate negotiations and actions.
Short Summary:
India’s strong advocacy at the ICJ highlights the urgent need for equitable climate action and sufficient climate finance from developed nations. With a focus on judgment and responsibility, the outcome could shape global climate policies moving forward.
