Court Rejects Gujarat Govt’s Plea to Drop Charges Against Karni Sena Activists
Short Description
A court in Ahmedabad has denied the Gujarat government’s request to withdraw charges against 19 Karni Sena activists involved in violent protests against the film ‘Padmavat.’
Read Time
2 minutes and 30 seconds
Main Article
A sessions court in Ahmedabad has recently refused a plea from the Gujarat government to withdraw criminal charges against 19 members of the Karni Sena. The activists had been implicated in violent activities during protests against the release of the controversial film ‘Padmavat’ in 2018. Their actions included vandalism, torching vehicles, and severe property destruction, amounting to damages estimated at ₹16.4 lakh. The court’s ruling highlights significant legal principles surrounding public interest and community dominance, raising important discussions on state responsibilities and activism.
The court emphasized that the alleged offenses were committed to satisfy personal interests rather than upholding public welfare. The incidents stemmed from a candle march organized by the Karni Sena on January 23, 2018, which escalated into rioting and ended with serious charges, including arson and unlawful assembly. The ruckus not only drew media attention but also ignited discussions about freedom of expression versus public safety, making it a pertinent case in contemporary legal discourse.
In the lead-up to the session court’s hearing, the Gujarat government initially sought permission from the JMFC court to drop the criminal case, citing public interest as a reason for their request. However, the first motion was declined in 2022, prompting a further appeal to the higher sessions court. During this appeal, the government contended that the accused were not seasoned criminals—merely youths caught in a surge of emotions. They argued that allowing the withdrawal of prosecution would serve the greater good of society.
However, the additional sessions judge Hardik Shah underscored that such a decision cannot be made lightly. The court found that the public prosecutor did not adequately evaluate the implications of the withdrawal. This ruling not only reinforces judicial independence but also places a spotlight on the complex interplay between activism and legality in contemporary India. The court’s verdict could set a vital precedent for future cases involving activism and governmental responses to public dissent.
Short Summary
The Ahmedabad sessions court’s denial of the Gujarat government’s request to drop charges against 19 Karni Sena activists highlights critical issues of public interest and the legal ramifications of activism. As the case continues to unfold, it raises vital questions regarding the balance between community sentiments and lawful behavior.
