Short Description:
Assam Congress chief Gaurav Gogoi hits back at CM Himanta Biswa Sarma’s “Pakistani links” allegations, calling his presser a “superflop” and demanding answers over 4,000 acres of land acquisitions.
Read Time:
3 Minutes, 15 Seconds
Main Article:
Ahead of crucial assembly polls, Assam’s political arena has erupted into a fierce war of words, with Congress State President Gaurav Gogoi launching a sharp counterattack against Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. The clash centers on allegations of “national security” threats versus accusations of significant land acquisitions by the CM’s family. Gogoi labeled Sarma’s recent press conference—where he alleged Gogoi had a “deeper connection” with a Pakistani national—a “superflop” and a diversionary tactic. This political spat underscores the high-stakes environment in Assam, where trending news often revolves around corruption allegations and electoral strategy.
Gogoi emphatically dismissed the claims as “mindless and bogus,” accusing the Chief Minister of embarrassing himself on a national stage. Instead, he pivoted the narrative to demand transparency regarding how Sarma and his family allegedly amassed nearly 12,000 bighas (roughly 4,000 acres) of prime property across Assam. Gogoi vowed that if Congress comes to power, these lands would be taken and redistributed among the poor and landless. This counter-allegation taps directly into public interest surrounding asset growth of public figures and land rights, topics that resonate beyond India’s borders with audiences concerned with governance and equity.
Chief Minister Sarma had insisted the matter involved sensitive information sharing with Pakistan and warranted investigation by central agencies like the NIA or CBI. However, Gogoi framed the entire episode as a desperate pre-election smear campaign, stating, “If my wife is an ISI agent of Pakistan, then I am a R&AW agent of India.” The exchange highlights how political controversies often involve complex layers of personal allegation and policy debate, with each side attempting to control the news cycle ahead of votes. For observers of global politics and finance, this serves as a case study in how asset ownership and national security rhetoric can become central tools in electoral battles.
Short Summary:
The Assam political clash escalated as Gaurav Gogoi countered CM Himanta Biswa Sarma’s national security allegations by demanding answers on alleged family land acquisitions totaling 4,000 acres. Gogoi dismissed the claims as a “superflop” diversion tactic ahead of polls, refocusing public interest on questions of asset growth and transparency. This controversy underscores the potent mix of land rights, personal allegations, and electoral strategy dominating the state’s trending news cycle.
