Short Description: The Supreme Court intervened to add 49 Hamdard Institute PG medical seats to national counselling, preventing student losses due to procedural delays.
Read Time: 2 minutes, 15 seconds
Main Article:
In a significant move for medical education, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) to immediately include 49 postgraduate seats from the Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (HIMSR) in the ongoing All India Quota counselling for the 2025-26 academic year. This judicial intervention came in response to a petition by affected candidates, highlighting a critical regulatory approval bottleneck. The court ruled that students should not forfeit an entire academic year due to pending procedural formalities, specifically the issuance of a consent of affiliation from Jamia Hamdard Deemed to be University. This decision underscores the recurring friction between administrative timelines and student welfare.
The added postgraduate medical seats span a wide range of high-demand clinical and non-clinical disciplines, including General Medicine, General Surgery, Paediatrics, Orthopaedics, and Radiology. These seats are available under minority, self-financed, and NRI categories. Following the court’s order, the MCC promptly issued a formal notice integrating these seats into the Round III counselling matrix, allowing candidates from across India to immediately lock their preferences. This action ensures that the national centralized counselling process remains inclusive and competitive, despite the unresolved affiliation issue.
This case serves as a pivotal example of how judicial oversight can act as a corrective mechanism within complex educational infrastructure. It highlights a systemic challenge where delays in bureaucratic processes—ranging from university affiliations to regulatory clearances—can disrupt crucial admission cycles. The Supreme Court’s proactive stance prioritizes student opportunity over procedural hurdles, setting a precedent for handling similar conflicts in the future. For stakeholders, including aspiring doctors and educational institutions, it reinforces the importance of streamlined, predictable approval pathways to safeguard academic schedules and investments in professional training.
Short Summary:
The Supreme Court’s directive to add 49 Hamdard Institute PG seats to national counselling averted a potential loss of an academic year for many students. This move resolved a critical impasse caused by delayed regulatory approval and university affiliation, ensuring the All India Quota counselling process could proceed inclusively. The case highlights the ongoing need for efficient administrative coordination within India’s medical education infrastructure to protect student interests and maintain admission timelines.
