Short Description: Top tennis stars demand Grand Slams reverse wearable tech ban. Sabalenka & Alcaraz fight for health data access, sparking a major sports tech debate.
Read Time: 2 minutes 45 seconds
Main Article:
In a move highlighting the growing clash between tradition and technology in professional sports, world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka has publicly urged Grand Slam tournaments to reverse their ban on wearable technology. The call to action comes after Sabalenka, Carlos Alcaraz, and Jannik Sinner were asked to remove their Whoop bands during the Australian Open, despite the devices being approved for in-match use by the International Tennis Federation (ITF) and permitted on the ATP and WTA tours. This discrepancy has ignited a fierce debate about athlete data rights, performance optimization, and the inconsistent governance in elite tennis.
The core of the argument centers on player health tracking and performance analytics. Whoop bands monitor critical biometrics like heart rate variability, sleep quality, and recovery stats—data top athletes use to fine-tune training and prevent injury. Sabalenka, a Whoop ambassador, stated the device is “just for tracking my health,” expressing confusion over the Grand Slam ban. Critics, including the Professional Tennis Players’ Association, argue that denying access to personal biometric data is outdated, especially when major North American leagues like the NFL, NBA, and MLB have established frameworks for approved wearable technology. This puts the Grand Slam rules under scrutiny for being out of step with modern sports science and athlete needs.
Beyond health metrics, the controversy taps into broader player grievances about data control and ownership. Players like Daria Kasatkina have previously criticized restrictive media rights deals that limit their access to match footage. The wearable ban is seen as another example of tournaments controlling information that originates from the athlete’s own body. As sports technology becomes a multi-billion-dollar industry, the standoff at the Australian Open raises significant questions: Who owns an athlete’s performance data? And what obligation do premier events have to integrate sports technology that can enhance safety and career longevity? With the French Open next on the calendar, pressure is mounting on tournament organizers to standardize regulations and embrace a data-forward approach.
Short Summary: The Australian Open’s ban on wearable tech like Whoop bands, despite ITF approval, has top players like Sabalenka and Alcaraz demanding change. The conflict underscores a major shift in sports, highlighting demands for athlete data rights, modernized Grand Slam rules, and the integration of health tracking technology to optimize performance and safety in professional tennis.
