Short Description
India’s latest Rural Development Budget shifts focus, slashing MGNREGA funds by 66% to prioritize the new VB-G RAM G and rural housing schemes.
Read Time
4 minutes 15 seconds
Main Article
A Major Reallocation in India’s Rural Budget Strategy
India’s latest budget reveals a strategic pivot in its approach to rural development and welfare spending. For the 2026-27 fiscal year, the newly introduced VB-G RAM G scheme has emerged as the centerpiece, commanding a massive 40% share of the Department of Rural Development’s total allocation of ₹1,94,369 crore (approx. $233 billion). This scheme, set to replace the long-standing Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGS), signifies a fundamental shift in policy and funding allocation. In stark contrast, the allocation for MGNREGS has been reduced dramatically by 66% to ₹30,000 crore. Concurrently, the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Gramin (PMAY-G) for rural housing received a significant 69% boost, bringing its share to 23% of the department’s budget.
Implications for Rural Employment and Fiscal Responsibility
The transition from MGNREGA to VB-G RAM G carries substantial implications for both workers and state finances. Under the old MGNREGA framework, the central government bore nearly 90% of the scheme’s costs. However, the new VB-G RAM G Act mandates a changed fund-sharing pattern, where the central and state governments will share expenses in a 60:40 ratio (90:10 for special category states). This shift means state governments’ expenditure on rural employment guarantees is poised to increase significantly. The move comes alongside data showing that under MGNREGA, average annual employment per household has hovered around 48 days, with less than 10% of households completing 100 days of work. Furthermore, a persistent issue has been the gap between notified and actual wages paid, a budget trend that the new scheme will need to address.
Analyzing the Broader Budget Trends and Outcomes
Beyond employment, the budget highlights ongoing challenges in other key areas. While the PMAY-G budget has skyrocketed, reports indicate only about 70% of targeted houses have been completed due to delays from land issues, migration, and beneficiary constraints. The dramatic budget cuts to MGNREGS, paired with increased allocations for VB-G RAM G, PMAY-G, and the PMGSY (rural roads), suggest a government strategy moving beyond pure wage employment to a mix of housing, infrastructure, and a revised job guarantee. This re-prioritization within the rural development budget aims to create tangible assets and address multi-dimensional poverty, though its success hinges on effective implementation and the financial capacity of state governments under the new cost-sharing model.
Short Summary
India’s 2026-27 rural budget marks a decisive shift, prioritizing the new VB-G RAM G scheme and rural housing (PMAY-G) while sharply cutting MGNREGA funding. The change introduces a new fund-sharing pattern that increases financial responsibility for state governments. This strategic reallocation reflects a move towards building rural infrastructure and assets alongside a revised employment guarantee framework.
